• Accessibility page
  • Search skiplink
  • Main navigation skiplink
  • Main content skiplink
  • Utility Navigation skiplink
  • Contact NZTA
SmartMovez logo
NZTA logo
  • Give us feedback
  • Site help
  • Site map
  • Outcomes
  • Various topics
  • Activities
  • Planning & funding
  • Data
  • Web tools
  • References
  • About NZTA
Home Economic evaluation manual 2005 - vol 2 (demand management & transport services) Ch 7 Benefits and costs of transport services 7.7 - Costs to government

References

  • Planning, programming and funding
  • Economic evaluation
  • Procurement

7.7 - Costs to government

  • 7.1 - Benefits and costs of transport services
  • 7.2 - Transport service user benefits
  • 7.3 - Congestion benefits
  • 7.4 - Accident reduction benefits
  • 7.5 - Disbenefits during implementation/construction
  • 7.6 - Other benefits and national strategic factors
  • 7.7 - Costs to government
  • 7.8 - Present value of benefits and costs

7.7 - Costs to government

Introduction

The costs to government of a transport service incorporate:

  • the funding gap (chapter 6)
  • road maintenance and construction cost savings
  • road user charges foregone.

Road maintenance and construction cost savings

Some transport service proposals will provide a cost saving to government if:

  • future planned road construction costs are avoided (freight and passenger services)
  • the implementation of the proposal results in a reduction to road maintenance expenditure when traffic is removed from the road (freight services only).

Government cost savings have the effect of reducing the bottom line figure of the efficiency ratio, potentially making a transport service proposal more attractive.

The transport service proposal and any other options are assessed to determine any planned road construction savings and, in the case of freight services, any road maintenance savings that will be made as compared to the do minimum roading option.

Care must be taken when claiming a cost saving from future road construction avoided. The year or years in which the road construction would likely be funded must be assessed.

Note:

Normally road construction cost savings should only be claimed if there are significant road user benefits associated with the transport service proposal.

Road maintenance and improvement cost savings associated with implementation of a freight services proposal are calculated by estimating the total annual amount of freight traffic, measured in terms of 'equivalent design axles' (EDA), removed from the roading network. The simplified procedure for freight services provides indicative EDA and $/EDA/km values. However, local values are to be used for proposals where the default values provided in these simplified procedures do not represent local conditions. Also, if the amount of the freight traffic removed from the roading network varies from year to year, separate calculations are required for each year.

Road user charges foregone

In New Zealand, road user charges include:

  • road user charges for all diesel-engined vehicles, and vehicles over
    3.5 tonnes
  • petrol excise tax for all petrol-engined vehicles.

For the purposes of this manual, it is assumed that all vehicles used in freight services will be paying road user charges.

Note:

For passenger services it is not necessary to calculate the loss of road user payments.

In the case of a freight service, lost road user charges are subtracted from the road maintenance and construction cost savings to derive the net savings to government.

For freight-based services, it is assumed that heavy commercial vehicles will be removed from the road. Thus, the loss of road user payment as a result of the introduction of a freight service will be based on the weighted average road user charge for the type of vehicle that is removed.

Determine the reduction in road user charges as a result of the introduction of freight service using the following procedure:

Step Action
1 From the demand estimate information generated in chapter 3, list the following for each travel time period:
  • existing number of road trips by the vehicle type affected by the transport service proposal
  • the predicted new level of road trips by the vehicle type affected by the transport service proposal.
Note:  The travel time period used will depend on the particular freight service being proposed but in most cases will probably be an annual figure.
2 Determine the change in road trips by subtracting the existing number of road trips from the predicted new level of road trips.
3 Using the data from step 1 and consulting with the industry(ies) affected by the proposed freight service, determine the average licensed weight of the vehicle type(s) removed.
4 Using the road user charges tables published by Land Transport New Zealand, establish the appropriate road user charge (in $/1000km) for the average licence weight of the vehicles removed.
5 Determine the length (in kms) of the road(s) affected by the proposed transport service.
6 Calculate the total number of kms of travelling saved as follows:

  (change in road trips per annum) × (km per trip)

Divide this by 1000 to find the annual thousands of kms saved.
7 Multiply the road user charge ($/1000km) by the annual thousands of kms saved to derive the total lost road user charges.

  • Give us feedback
  • Site help
  • Site map
  • NZ Transport Agency website
  • © Copyright
  • Disclaimer
New Zealand government logoSustainability logo